I believe the major advantage for women is that we are more likely to have a supportive network of familia and friends around us than guys are. And I think that we are more inclined to admit that we do not understand things and to seek out help when we need it than men are. It’s a cliche but it is a fantastic example, that when girls become lost when they are out driving, they stop and ask for directions.
I’m sure many people have experienced guys who would never dream of asking for directions – they simply continue driving in the hope that they will finally find their way again. In precisely the exact same manner, I think that girls are more inclined to seek out help and emotional support when they need it than men are. A recent report by the Equality and Human Rights Commission here in the UK claims that ‘Women are outstripping men in a dozen different ways that imply their lives are often better than men’s lives are’.
It said women are more likely to be well-educated, less likely to lose their jobs in the recession, and more inclined to care for their salud by eating their five daily fruit and veggies and by visiting their physician when they first begin noticing symptoms. By comparison, men do not live as long as girls, they are more likely to be obese and they are three times more likely to take their own lives – presumably because they do not have those supportive networks to turn to.
So there are benefits to being a chica that will work in our favour in retirement. The significant disadvantage for girls is a fiscal one, we are more likely to be poorer than men. Although we’re more likely than our mother’s generation to have had jobs, we are still more likely than men to invest our retirement . According to a recent report, over three-fifths of single pensioner households here in Britain – many of which will be single mujer pensioner families, have a total income of less than #10,000 and another, American, report by the Women’s Institute for a Secure Retirement, stated that more than 1 in 10 girls live on less than $10,000 annually in retirement. Women are more likely to have worked in low-paid jobs or to have worked part-time – when I was married, my husband was a manager of a negocio and I worked as a part-time lecturer.
My wage went towards vacations and luxuries – it was not essential money, I did not need to work fulltime and I was happy to not. It was only when I became divorced I began working fulltime again because I could not afford to live on my part-time income. Along with all that, girls are more likely to have had time from the workplace due to increasing children or looking after elderly parents, so they have fewer years to build up their retirement savings. At exactly the exact same time, during that time they are out of the office, they are also losing out on years of paying into a retirement plan – and if this has an employer contribution, they are missing out on the employer’s contribution also.
Most women who have kids, have them throughout their most important career-development years. Their male colleagues remain in the work force, getting promotions and climbing the corporate ladder. When those girls go back to the workforce after the children are in school, they are usually going back in at precisely the exact same level that they left before, or, if they discover that their skills are obsolete, they are going back in at a lower level. So all this places women farther behind in their professions and further behind with their retirement savings.
There are a few different items that contribute to women’s possibility of poverty in retirement. Along with girls generally earning less than men over the course of their lifetimes, they live longer, so any money they have managed to accumulate must last them longer. We have the fact that girls tend to care for everyone else in the household before considering their particular needs and thus they tend to use their money to help somebody else, as opposed to investing it for their own retirement. They’ll help their children out, or else they’ll use their cash to support their older relatives as opposed to sticking in a retirement fund.