Here is a reality check: usually stereotyped as happening to men, today more women than men are experiencing midlife crisis. Within an ironic twist of circumstance, increases in size of both higher educational and occupational status appear to raise the likelihood for midlife crisis, in order that baby boomer women feel more oppressed than their mothers actually.
The rate of extramarital affairs is add up to that of men nearly, and midlife divorce rates well eating disorders – are steadily increasing -as. Yet women’s inflation-adjusted earnings have risen 17% within the last 15 years, while men’s have fallen. We’re searching for college at nearly twice the entire rate, And typically feeling 7 years younger than we are really, we’ve much greater expectations from our longevity.
Writer Sue Shellenbarger heard from a lot of women who have been radically changing course searching for greater fulfillment after authoring her very own midlife crisis in her Wall Street Journal column. Reporting on her behalf research in The Breaking Point: The way the Female Midlife Crisis is Transforming Today’s Women, she describes how increased education plays a part in women’s higher expectations for an improved standard of living.
Yet women discover the exhaustion and stress due to working extended hours, repressing their feminine side to achieve success at the job often, and the nonstop juggling with family roles, causes them to reduce focus and feel their lives are complex and uncontrollable too. Because women are able to create career changes now, and also have confidence and skills to do something upon their desires, they are making the effort to re-connect with themselves to shed their roles and only new pursuits in adventure, sports, sex, romance, education, and spirituality.
Shellenbarger writes that the normal path of crisis either erupts as a Sonic Boom, or unfolds as a far more hesitant, acceptable Slow Burn socially. She also describes women’s angst as propelled primarily by one powerful, repressed passion, the right section of oneself that begs for expression and reintegration. She calls these archetypal drivers the Lover, the first choice, the Adventurer, the Artist, the Seeker, and the Gardener, reflecting our core human capabilities to love, to generate, also to learn.